In addition, countries could restrict trade for national security reasons. These include patent protection, copyright and public morality. In the end, tariffs fell by 35%, with the exception of textiles, chemicals, steel and other sensitive products; In addition to a 15% to 18% reduction in tariffs on agricultural and food products. In addition, the chemical negotiations resulted in an interim agreement on the abolition of the US selling price (ASP). This was a method of assessing certain chemicals used by these countries for the institution of import duties, which gave domestic producers a much higher level of protection than indicated under tariff conditions. However, their main achievement was the adoption of Part IV of the GATT, which freed them from the corresponding reciprocity with developed countries in trade negotiations. In the view of many developing countries, this was a direct consequence of UNCTAD I`s request for a better trade agreement for them. Agriculture has been essentially excluded from previous agreements, as it has been granted special status in the areas of import quotas and export subsidies, with slight reserves. However, at the time of the Uruguay Round, many countries considered the agricultural exception so egregious that they refused to sign a new no-move agreement for agricultural products. These fourteen countries were known as the « Cairns Group » and consisted mainly of small and medium-sized agricultural exporters such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia and New Zealand. Ensure compliance with laws and rules that are not contrary to the provisions of this agreement, including those relating to the protection of patents, trademarks and copyrights and the prevention of fraudulent practices; In May 1963, ministers agreed on three negotiating objectives: the WTO was created in 1995 to succeed the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), born after the Second World War.
THE WTO agreements, which are important for food protection measures, are measures relating to health and plant health measures (SPS) 2 and technical barriers to trade (OTC). The SPS and OBT agreements are complementary, both constituting the general legal basis for other legally binding international agreements and instruments that will be adopted on a voluntary basis, such as the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (Karnicki, 1996). The SPS agreement includes: relevant laws, regulations and regulations; testing, inspection, certification and authorisation procedures; packaging and labelling requirements directly related to food safety.